Book 9 / Chapter 10
Paragraph 3 - The Limit of Friendships
Explanation - Part By Part
"But as regards good friends, should we have as many as possible, or is there a limit to the number of one's friends, as there is to the size of a city?"
Aristotle is questioning whether there should be a limit to how many true, virtuous friends one can have, much like there are limits to the size of a city. Just as a city cannot function properly if it is too small or too large, friendships based on goodness need a balance—they thrive within certain boundaries, rather than being endless. It's not about quantity, but about finding a number that allows those friendships to be meaningful and sustainable.
"You cannot make a city of ten men, and if there are a hundred thousand it is a city no longer. But the proper number is presumably not a single number, but anything that falls between certain fixed points."
This part uses the analogy of a city to explore the idea of limits in relationships, specifically in how many truly meaningful friendships one can sustain. Aristotle points out that a city, to function as a city, cannot be made up of only ten people—that's too small. Similarly, it can't consist of an overwhelmingly large number, like a hundred thousand, because then it would lose the sense of community and togetherness that defines a city. The "proper number" of citizens lies somewhere between these two extremes.
He applies this reasoning to friendships, suggesting that there isn't one perfect, fixed number of friends that works for everyone, but there are practical limits. Too few friends might not offer the rich and fulfilling connections we need for a good life. Too many, on the other hand, might dilute the closeness and quality of those connections, making it difficult to maintain genuine intimacy or mutual care. So, the ideal number of friends is somewhere between those extremes—enough to provide meaningful relationships without overwhelming oneself.
"So for friends too there is a fixed number perhaps the largest number with whom one can live together (for that, we found, thought to be very characteristic of friendship); and that one cannot live with many people and divide oneself up among them is plain."
This part highlights an important idea: there is a practical limit to the number of meaningful friendships a person can have, especially when it comes to deep, virtuous friendships. Aristotle emphasizes that true friendship involves spending time together and sharing life in a significant way. Since our time and energy are limited, it’s clear that we cannot maintain this level of closeness with a large number of people. Attempting to "divide yourself" among too many would dilute the intimacy and depth that real friendship requires.
"Further, they too must be friends of one another, if they are all to spend their days together; and it is a hard business for this condition to be fulfilled with a large number."
Aristotle is saying that for a group of friends to truly enjoy a deep and meaningful friendship together, they must all share a mutual bond, not just with the central individual (you) but also with one another. Essentially, a group of close friends needs to feel connected as a group, not just as separate connections to one person. However, creating and maintaining such mutual friendship within a group is incredibly challenging, especially as the group grows larger. The larger the group, the harder it becomes for everyone to sustain this level of close connection and shared understanding.
"It is found difficult, too, to rejoice and to grieve in an intimate way with many people, for it may likely happen that one has at once to be happy with one friend and to mourn with another."
Aristotle is pointing out the emotional limitations of human relationships. He argues that it's challenging to deeply share both joy and sorrow with a large number of people. For example, if one friend is celebrating something wonderful while another is going through a tough time, it can be really hard—if not impossible—to truly be there for both at the same time. This emotional conflict highlights why meaningful, close friendships are better kept to a smaller number: it allows for genuine and focused emotional connection, which isn't feasible with too many people.
"Presumably, then, it is well not to seek to have as many friends as possible, but as many as are enough for the purpose of living together; for it would seem actually impossible to be a great friend to many people."
Aristotle is saying that we shouldn't aim to have an unlimited number of friends, but rather, just enough to truly share life with. Deep, meaningful friendships require time, effort, and emotional connection, and it's simply not possible to maintain those deep ties with too many people. True friendship is about quality, not quantity. By focusing on a smaller, more meaningful group, we can genuinely nurture and live alongside our friends in a way that great friendship requires.
"This is why one cannot love several people; love is ideally a sort of excess of friendship, and that can only be felt towards one person; therefore great friendship too can only be felt towards a few people."
Aristotle is making an important point here about the depth of relationships. He argues that love, in its truest and most intense form, is like a heightened version of friendship. It's so deep and consuming that it’s simply not possible to feel this level of connection with multiple people. Just as with "great friendship," such a profound bond requires significant emotional energy, trust, and time—things that naturally limit how many people you can share it with. Essentially, true love or deep friendship demands focus and exclusivity because it’s about quality, not quantity.
"This seems to be confirmed in practice; for we do not find many people who are friends in the comradely way of friendship, and the famous friendships of this sort are always between two people."
Aristotle is pointing out that, in reality, deep and meaningful friendships—the kind of friendships based on shared values, virtue, and genuine connection—are rare. When we think of "classic" or "famous" examples of such close bonds, they are typically between just two individuals rather than a large group. This highlights the limited capacity we have as humans to forge and maintain truly profound relationships with many people at the same time.
"Those who have many friends and mix intimately with them all are thought to be no one's friend, except in the way proper to fellow-citizens, and such people are also called obsequious."
Aristotle is pointing out that someone who tries to be close, intimate friends with a large number of people often ends up being perceived as not truly a friend to anyone. This is because genuine, deep friendship requires time, effort, and emotional connection, which are difficult to extend meaningfully to many people at once. Instead, these individuals are seen as engaging in shallow or surface-level social interactions, more akin to the polite, civil relationships we might have with acquaintances or fellow members of a community (what he calls "fellow-citizens"). Aristotle suggests that this excessive effort to please or connect widely with others can come across as insincere or overly eager, which is why such people might be labeled as "obsequious"—a term for being overly submissive or trying too hard to please everyone.
"In the way proper to fellow-citizens, indeed, it is possible to be the friend of many and yet not be obsequious but a genuinely good man; but one cannot have with many people the friendship based on virtue and on the character of our friends themselves, and we must be content if we find even a few such."
In this part, Aristotle is clarifying the distinction between different types of relationships. He acknowledges that it's possible to have friendly and respectful connections with many people in a broad sense, like the way we might interact with fellow members of our community or society. You can be polite, kind, and fair to acquaintances or fellow citizens without being overly flattering (obsequious) or insincere. Such relationships might involve goodwill and decency but don't require deep personal bonds.
However, he emphasizes that true friendships—the kind grounded in shared virtue and genuine appreciation for the other person's character—are rare and can only exist with a few people. These virtuous friendships require meaningful, intimate connections and a mutual commitment to each other's moral development and well-being. Given the emotional and time investment required for these deep relationships, it's simply not feasible to have such bonds with many people. Therefore, Aristotle suggests that we should not strive for an abundance of virtuous friends but instead feel fortunate if we find even a handful of them.